Reports of mass deaths at Auschwitz-Birkenau following the documented typhoid epidemic of 1942 prompted Himmler to issue an order on December 28, 1942 to
“reduce the death toll in concentration camps at all costs.”
"I can conceive of no greater calamity than the assimilation of the Negro into our social and political life as our equal….We can never attain the Ideal union our fathers dreamed, with millions of an alien, inferior race among us, whose assimilation is neither possible nor desirable."
— Abraham Lincoln, after signing the Emancipation Proclamation
"Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these people [blacks] are to be free, nor is it less certain that the two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government."
— Thomas Jefferson in a letter to George Washington, January 4, 1786
National Socialism on individualism and democracy (highlights from Richard Tedor’s Hitler’s Revolution).
Conservatives have been fooled into thinking individualism is the most important thing ever, even though it is just another word for liberalism. No nation can exist when everybody is putting his own needs before those of his community. Being unselfish is how you conserve a nation; not being obsessed with individualism.
“Now think for a second the outrage there would be if someone put up 5 posters of white people in some African or Middle Eastern country and wrote ‘Typical Nigerians’ , ‘Typical Saudis’ ‘Typical Pakistanis’ and so on…”
The Winter Olympics begin in two days,
and Team USA has a problem: with the largest winter team America has
ever assembled, at 243 athletes, there are only 10 blacks, a fact the
U.S. Olympic Committee (USOC) laments and wants to ameliorate.
USOC’s director of diversity and
inclusion, Jason Thompson, said of the overwhelming majority of white
athletes, “We’re not quite where we want to be” (quoted in The
Washington Post).
Where they want to be is a place with fewer whites than there already
are.
To make the basketball and
track-and-field teams more diverse would mean replacing some of the
blacks with whites. This is frowned upon. Whites are not allowed to
replace blacks in anything. But white swimmers do need to be
replaced with black swimmers, and white skiers with black skiers. And
yes, this would mean we could kiss our potential swimming and skiing
medals goodbye, but at least we were inclusive and the 20-year-olds
on the Internet could finally stop calling the Winter Olympics
racist, at least until the next Winter Olympics.
Millennials need not fear, though, for
replacing whites with non-whites is one of the priorities of the
USOC. “We’ve just been trying to find ways to make sure our team
looks like America,” Thompson says. It’s as if he believes the racial makeup of the country was an organic development and not a result of the conscious efforts of the national and international governments and media, all brainwashing white people into suicidal
passiveness under threat of being called racist if they fight back.
So which of the white Olympians is
going to have his or her spot taken away for an under-qualified black guy? Which black person who
didn’t qualify based on his skills has to be humiliated by being
pushed into a group whose skills outshine his?
In the WaPo article linked at the
beginning, they use the term “African-American” do describe
blacks. The Polish teams don’t feature French-Polish, because a
French-Pole is not a Pole. The Portuguese teams don’t feature
“German-Portuguese,” because a German-Portuguese is not a
Portuguese. So why, in the context of the Olympics, in which nations
compete, are two nations being included as one? Are they African or
are they American?
They are Africans who happen to live in America.
And yes, I understand Africa is not a nation, but all of the nations
of Africa are more related culturally to each other than to any place
in the European settlement known as America.
You’re being replaced, white people, and American institutions are celebrating.
Supporters of Evan McMullin know it is mathematically impossible–mathematically impossible!–for him to win the election. They KNOW that supporting him will siphon votes from Trump, NOT from Hillary, whom they claim to oppose.
So why does #NeverTrump support McMullin, which will result in a Hillary win, rather than voting for Hillary directly? Because to #NeverTrump, symbolism is more important than outcome. That’s one of the greatest problems of conservatism.
#NeverTrump has a principle: Constitutionalism or utter destruction of America. So #NeverTrump supports McMullin because they get to say that they stood for Constitutionalism even as they caused the nation’s death.
#NeverTrump people supporting McMullin are just being self-righteous. Their love of the country is symbolic, not actual. Proof of this is their “vote your conscience” BS. #NeverTrump’s conscience will feel just fine after surrendering country to Third World progressives. “America belongs to Third World progressives now who HATE the Constitution, but at least *I* supported the Constitution by being #NeverTrump.”
In an effort to “save Constitutionalism,” #NeverTrump is fine surrendering the USA to people who hate the Constitution. Because “principles.” #NeverTrump’s principle is literally “We support the surrender of America in defense of the Constitution.”
They are treasonous bastards. But at least they will feel good about themselves while America becomes an Islamo-Mexican hellhole. They were principled!